Kyle Thomas Hemingway: The ephemera edit

An ongoing digital archive of 1,364 items (and counting) proving that I read, I saw, and I actually paid attention.

Collection

Fashion

  • Ametora: How Japan Saved American Style

    by W. David Marx

    “So how did the Japanese save American style? The Americans discarded style as it became unfashionable and moved on to new things. The Japanese collected, analysed and improved it, and sold it back.”

  • The Devil Wears Prada 2

    Directed by David Frankel

    “And the models were encouraged to mill around like starving goats in the parking lot of a methadone clinic in New Jersey?”

  • “Men, she suggested, should stop looking at clothes as signifiers of gender and class and just enjoy them.”

  • D.V.

    by Diana Vreeland

    “What Elsie Mendl had was something else that’s particularly American—an appreciation of vulgarity. Vulgarity is a very important ingredient in life. I’m a great believer in vulgarity—if it’s got vitality. A little bad taste is like a nice splash of paprika. We all need a splash of bad taste—it’s hearty, it’s healthy, it’s physical. I think we could use more of it. No taste is what I’m against.”

  • La Galerie Dior

    Paris, Île-de-France

    Muslins of the most iconic Dior silhouettes through history
  • Dress Up

    Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

    Installation view, Dress Up
  • Worn: A People’s History of Clothing

    by Sofi Thanhauser

    “As the garment industry left the United States, it undid the work of industrial feminists like Clara Lemlich and Rose Schneiderman, who had the audacity to demand that intellectual satisfaction was the birthright of every sewing machine operator. This new brand of feminism didn’t care to protect sewing work as good work; rather it scoured the earth to find the cheapest new sources of exploitable, female labor.”

  • Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster

    by Dana Thomas

    “Real luxurious people hate status. You don’t look rich because you have a rich dress. When you look at a person, do you see the spirit or the sexiness or the creativity? Just to see a big diamond, what does it mean? It’s all about satisfaction. I think it’s horrible, this judgment based on money. It’s all an illusion that you look better because you have a symbol of luxury. Really, it doesn’t bring you anything. It’s so banal.”

  • In America: A Lexicon of Fashion

    Metropolitan Museum of Art

    Vaquera, spring 2021
  • “If you cannot walk more than a block in your shoes, they are not shoes; they are pretty sculptures that you happen to have attached to your feet. You could hang them from your wrists for all the good they are doing you in terms of locomotion. Better to put them on a shelf and admire them from afar.”

  • “…from her earliest days at Versailles, Marie Antoinette staged a revolt against entrenched court etiquette by turning her clothes and other accoutrements into defiant expressions of autonomy and prestige…it is my belief that she identified fashion as a key weapon in her struggle for personal prestige, authority, and sometimes mere survival.”

  • Gender Bending Fashion

    Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

    Rick Owens, Caftan from the Dirt collection, 2018
  • “The evening of Wednesday, November 28, 1973, as guests began arriving at Versailles, the palace glowed under a full moon and through a scrim of light snow—the first dusting of the season. Red uniformed, saber-wielding gendarmes flanked the gilded palace gates, along with some four hundred footmen in eighteenth-century white powdered wigs and livery. Marie-Hélène de Rothschild, dressed in green, ostrich-trimmed gown by Yves Saint Laurent and with solitary diamonds pinned in her thick hair greeted guests; brushing kisses on the cheeks of the French and offering handshakes to the Americans.”

  • Issue 8 : On Authenticity

    Vestoj: The Journal of Sartorial Matters

    “Once we see that authenticity is a positional good with its own self-radicalising dynamic, it becomes easier to understand a lot of what is going on in the culture. Most importantly, it helps us understand the motivation behind the distinction between authenticity and ‘authenticity,’ or between the genuine form and the fake version. And to repeat, it has nothing to do with co-optation or selling out: it is nothing more than the difference between a form of conspicuous behaviour where the uselessness of the activity remains implicit, and one where its function as a locus of status-seeking becomes cringe-inducingly explicit.”

  • Schiaparelli and Prada: Impossible Conversations

    Metropolitan Museum of Art

  • #FUGQ

    A party proving wrong GQ’s assertion that Boston is the least stylish city in the country (The Brahmin)

    Posing amidst the fashionable merriment